Acta Natura et Scientia
ISSN (Online): 2718-0638

Research article    |    Open Access
Acta Natura et Scientia 2025, Vol. 6(2) 149-172

Multi-Level Analysis of Wheat Import Sensitivity in IGAD Countries: From Country-Level Elasticities to Regional Causal Dynamics

Aden Moussa Douksiye, Abdullah Açık

pp. 149 - 172   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.61326/actanatsci.v6i2.408

Publish Date: December 12, 2025  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0

PDF Download

Abstract

This paper explores how wheat import volumes in Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) countries respond to global price changes, and whether these reactions vary across countries or over time. Wheat is a critical staple in the region, and its import dynamics are increasingly important as the bloc faces recurring shocks like drought, conflict, and global price spikes. Using a two-pronged approach, we first apply country-level autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) models and find long-run cointegration across all IGAD members. Eritrea and Ethiopia show strong long-run negative price elasticities, pointing to substitution or price-sensitive behavior. South Sudan, Sudan, and Somalia display short-run positive responses, likely linked to urgent procurement or aid-related deliveries. Uganda shows limited responsiveness, while Djibouti—though also reactive in the short term—likely reflects its role as a re-export hub rather than fragility-driven volatility. Kenya shows both long-run sensitivity and short-run spikes, indicating a more complex market and policy mix. At the bloc level, panel Granger causality tests reveal a two-way relationship between global wheat prices and imports. Notably, imports also Granger-cause price shifts—an unexpected result suggesting that even uncoordinated regional import behavior may shape market expectations. This finding strengthens the case for more strategic procurement and regional storage mechanisms.

Keywords: IGAD, Wheat imports, Price volatility, Panel causality, ARDL

How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Douksiye, A.M., & Acik, A. (2025). Multi-Level Analysis of Wheat Import Sensitivity in IGAD Countries: From Country-Level Elasticities to Regional Causal Dynamics. Acta Natura et Scientia, 6(2), 149-172. https://doi.org/10.61326/actanatsci.v6i2.408

Harvard
Douksiye, A. and Acik, A. (2025). Multi-Level Analysis of Wheat Import Sensitivity in IGAD Countries: From Country-Level Elasticities to Regional Causal Dynamics. Acta Natura et Scientia, 6(2), pp. 149-172.

Chicago 16th edition
Douksiye, Aden Moussa and Abdullah Acik (2025). "Multi-Level Analysis of Wheat Import Sensitivity in IGAD Countries: From Country-Level Elasticities to Regional Causal Dynamics". Acta Natura et Scientia 6 (2):149-172. https://doi.org/10.61326/actanatsci.v6i2.408

References
  1. APTERR Secretariat. (2022). APTERR Annual Report 2022. ASEAN Plus Three Emergency Rice Reserve Secretariat. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bobenrieth, E., Wright, B., & Zeng, D. (2013). Stocks-to-use ratios and prices as indicators of vulnerability to spikes in global cereal markets. Agricultural Economics, 44(S1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Bölük, G., & Mert, M. (2015). The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: An ARDL approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. ECOWAS. (2013). Charter for the Establishment of the Regional Food Security Reserve. ECOWAS Commission. [Google Scholar]
  6. FAO. (2020). Evaluation of the ECOWAS Regional Food Security Reserve. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  7. FAO. (2021). Building Resilient Food Systems in IGAD Region: The Case for Regional Grain Reserves. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  8. FAO. (2022a). The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets 2022: The geography of food and agricultural trade: Policy approaches for sustainable development. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  9. FAO. (2022b). Horn of Africa Drought Response Plan. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  10. FAO. (2022c). The Importance of Ukraine and the Russian Federation for Global Agricultural Markets and the Risks Associated with the Current Conflict. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  11. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, & WHO. (2023). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023: Urbanization, agrifood systems transformation and healthy diets across the rural–urban continuum. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3017en [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  12. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, & WHO. (2024). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2024: Building resilience to global shocks. FAO. [Google Scholar]
  13. Government of India. (2017). Buffer Stocking Policy in Foodgrains. Department of Food and Public Distribution. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Headey, D., & Fan, S. (2008). Anatomy of a crisis: The causes and consequences of surging food prices. Agricultural Economics, 39(S1), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00345.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Headey, D., & Fan, S. (2010). Reflections on the global food crisis: How did it happen? How has it hurt? And how can we prevent the next one? International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). [Google Scholar]
  17. IFPRI. (2024). 2024 Global Food Policy Report: Climate Change and Food Systems. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). [Google Scholar]
  18. IGAD. (2025). About IGAD. Retrieved on July 10, 2025, from https://igad.int/about/ [Google Scholar]
  19. IMF. (2022). World Economic Outlook: War Sets Back the Global Recovery. IMF. [Google Scholar]
  20. Index Mundi. (2025). Wheat Data. Retrieved on 10 June, 2025, from https://www.indexmundi.com/ [Google Scholar]
  21. Juodis, A., Karavias, Y., & Sarafidis, V. (2021). A homogeneous approach to testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01970-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  22. Martin, W., & Anderson, K. (2012). Export restrictions and price insulation during commodity price booms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94(2), 422–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aar105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  23. OECD/FAO. (2022). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2022-2031. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f1b0b29c-en. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Ozturk, N., & Karagoz, K. (2012). Relationship between inflation and financial development: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Alanya Faculty of Business, 4(2), 81-87. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1995). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 9514, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Phillips, P. C. B. & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.2307/2336182 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Porter, J.R., Xie, L., Challinor, A. J., Cochrane, K., Howden, S. M., Iqbal, M. M., Lobell, D. B., & Travasso, M. I. (2014). Food security and food production systems. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects (pp. 485-533). Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Qamruzzaman, M., & Jianguo, W. (2018). Nexus between financial innovation and economic growth in South Asia: Evidence from ARDL and nonlinear ARDL approaches. Financial innovation, 4(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-018-0103-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  32. Raifu, I. A., Obaniyi, F. A., Nnamani, G., & Salihu, A. A. (2025). Revisiting causal relationship between renewable energy and economic growth in OECD countries: Evidence from a novel JKS’s Granger non-causality test. Renewable Energy, 244, 122559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.122559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  33. Simionescu, M., & Schneider, N. (2022). Revisiting the nuclear energy‐income nexus in Europe: An application of the JKS panel causality test with cross‐sectional dependence and heterogeneity. International Journal of Energy Research, 46(6), 8328-8351. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7731 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Statista. (2024a). Wheat import volume worldwide from 2014/2015 to 2024/2025 (in million metric tons). Retrieved on 10 July, 2025, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/738252/wheat-import-volume-worldwide/ [Google Scholar]
  35. Statista. (2024b). Wheat export volume worldwide from 2014/2015 to 2024/2025 (in million metric tons). Retrieved on 10 July, 2025, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/737926/wheat-export-volume-worldwide/ [Google Scholar]
  36. [Google Scholar]
  37. USAID. (2022). Market Systems Resilience in the Horn of Africa: Wheat Supply Chains under Stress. USAID Bureau for Resilience and Food Security. [Google Scholar]
  38. USDA. (2023). Grain: World Markets and Trade Report – Global Wheat Imports. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved on 23 July, 2025, from https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/ [Google Scholar]
  39. Wheeler, T., & von Braun, J. (2013). Climate change impacts on global food security. Science, 341(6145), 508–513. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  40. World Bank. (2022). Implications of the War in Ukraine on Global Commodity Markets. Retrieved on July 22, 2025, from https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099616504292238906 [Google Scholar]
  41. World Bank (2023). Food Security and Fragility in Conflict-Affected States: Navigating Supply Chain Shocks. World Bank Policy Brief. Retrieved on July 22, 2025, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/publication/future-of-food-building-stronger-food-systems-fcv [Google Scholar]
  42. World Bank. (2025). Population, total (indicator SP.POP.TOTL). Retrieved on 17 July, 2025, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL [Google Scholar]
  43. Wright, B. (2011). The economics of grain price volatility. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 33(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppq033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  44. Wright, B., & Williams, J. (1982). The economic role of commodity storage. The Economic Journal, 92(367), 596–614. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232552 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  45. Xiao, J., Karavias, Y., Juodis, A., Sarafidis, V., & Ditzen, J. (2023). Improved tests for Granger noncausality in panel data. The Stata Journal, 23(1), 230-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X231162034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
Meta
Vol. 6 (2)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 6 Issue 2

December 2025

All Manuscript

Acta Natura et Scientia

Copyright © 2025 Acta Natura et Scientia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY
All elements of this website were created using the BOQ™ - Intelligent Webverse System.